Post-Op Follow-Up Schedule That Prevents Prosthetic Delays (For Clinicians)
Many prosthetic delays do not happen because of surgical problems or device limitations. They happen
Bilateral amputation changes movement, balance, and independence in ways that go far beyond losing a single limb. For clinicians, selecting the right candidates for bilateral prosthetic rehabilitation requires careful judgment, realistic goal setting, and a deep understanding of both physical and psychological demands. The decisions made early often shape whether a patient regains mobility or faces long-term dependence.
This article explores selection criteria and expected outcomes for bilateral amputees in a clear and practical way, designed for doctors working in real clinical settings. It focuses on medical readiness, functional potential, emotional strength, and social support, helping clinicians decide who will benefit most from bilateral prosthetics and what outcomes can reasonably be expected over time.
Bilateral amputees face the loss of symmetry, balance, and natural load sharing, which makes movement more demanding and energy intensive than in unilateral cases.
Every task, from standing up to walking a few steps, requires higher coordination and strength.
Clinicians must view bilateral rehabilitation as a separate pathway, not an extension of unilateral care.
Bilateral amputation often results from vascular disease, diabetes, severe trauma, infection, or complications following limb salvage.
These underlying causes usually affect overall health, not just the limbs.
Selection criteria must therefore consider systemic disease alongside local limb status.
Some bilateral amputees regain high levels of independence, while others remain limited despite good devices.
Differences in health, motivation, and support explain much of this variation.
Early assessment helps predict which path is more likely.
Bilateral prosthetic walking demands significantly more energy than unilateral walking.
Patients with limited heart or lung reserve may fatigue quickly and face safety risks.
Medical clearance should focus on endurance, not just wound healing.
Conditions such as diabetes and kidney disease affect healing and strength.
Stable medical control supports safer rehabilitation and fewer setbacks.
Unstable disease often limits achievable outcomes.
Active or recurrent infection anywhere in the body increases rehabilitation risk.
Bilateral amputees have less margin for medical instability.
Infection control is essential before prosthetic trials.
Both residual limbs must tolerate socket pressure and shear.
Fragile skin on even one side can limit bilateral use.
Clinicians should assess tolerance over time, not at a single visit.
Short or uneven limb lengths increase energy cost and balance difficulty.
Muscle strength and control around both stumps influence stability.
These factors shape device choice and expectations.
Persistent pain or hypersensitivity can limit training intensity.
Pain on both sides compounds difficulty.
Pain control is a prerequisite for progress.
Without natural limbs for balance correction, trunk stability becomes critical.
Weak core muscles increase fall risk.
Pre-prosthetic conditioning is often necessary.
Upper limbs support transfers, mobility aids, and early walking.
Weak arms limit independence.
Strength testing should be part of selection.
Ability to maintain balance with support provides insight into potential.
Severe instability predicts slower progress.
Early balance testing guides goal setting.
Bilateral prosthetic use requires learning new movement strategies.
Patients must process feedback and adjust continuously.
Cognitive readiness affects training speed and safety.
Training involves repeated instruction and correction.
Poor memory or focus slows learning.
Clinicians should screen for cognitive barriers.
Falls carry higher consequences for bilateral users.
Good judgment and risk awareness are essential.
Poor insight increases danger.
Bilateral loss often triggers deeper grief and fear than unilateral loss.
Patients may feel a greater sense of dependency.
Emotional screening is critical.
Some patients feel forced to pursue prosthetics due to family or social expectations.
Externally driven motivation often fades.
Internal motivation predicts better outcomes.
Bilateral rehabilitation progresses gradually.
Patients who accept slow gains adapt better.
Impatience leads to frustration.
Steps, narrow spaces, and uneven floors affect safety.
Environmental barriers may limit prosthetic use.
Home assessment informs realistic goals.
Daily assistance is often needed in early stages.
Supportive caregivers improve outcomes.
Lack of support increases risk.
Return-to-work expectations influence goal setting.
Not all jobs suit bilateral prosthetic use.
Counseling may be needed.
Small alignment errors are magnified in bilateral users.
Precise fitting is essential.
Regular review is required.
Heavier devices increase fatigue.
Lightweight designs improve tolerance.
Component choice affects outcomes.
Complex systems require higher learning capacity.
Simpler solutions may work better initially.
Progression can be staged.
Many bilateral amputees achieve safe indoor walking.
Outdoor mobility may be limited or aided.
Goals should match capacity.
Walkers or canes may remain part of mobility.
Using aids does not mean failure.
Safety takes priority.
Transfers, self-care, and short walks define success.
Complete independence is not universal.
Clinicians should redefine success.
Bilateral rehabilitation takes more time.
Patients should expect extended therapy.
Clear timelines reduce frustration.
Progress often comes in phases.
Plateaus are normal.
Reassurance helps persistence.
Ongoing review prevents complications.
Adjustment is continuous.
Care does not end at discharge.
Some bilateral amputees carry higher risk due to age, advanced vascular disease, cardiac weakness, or poor wound history, which can limit safe progression even with strong motivation.
Early identification of these profiles allows clinicians to adjust goals and avoid unsafe expectations.
Risk awareness supports better planning rather than exclusion.
Not all risks are fixed, as weakness, balance deficits, or emotional distress can often improve with targeted intervention.
Clinicians should distinguish between factors that can change and those that cannot.
This distinction helps decide whether to delay, modify, or proceed.
Response to pre-prosthetic training often reveals true potential.
Patients who show steady adaptation and learning tend to progress further.
Early observation is often more reliable than prediction alone.
Bilateral rehabilitation benefits from clear phases that move from sitting balance to standing and then to controlled walking.
Skipping stages increases fall risk and frustration.
Structure builds confidence and safety.
Transfers often matter more than walking distance in daily life.
Learning safe movement between bed, chair, and toilet restores independence early.
These skills reduce caregiver burden.
Bilateral prosthetic walking consumes high energy.
Teaching pacing, rest planning, and efficient movement protects endurance.
Energy management improves long-term use.
Without a natural limb to rely on, balance must be learned consciously.
Patients use visual cues and trunk control to stay upright.
Training should focus on awareness, not speed.
Fear can limit effort and slow learning.
Gradual exposure and controlled environments reduce anxiety.
Confidence grows with safe repetition.
Early training within safe supports allows exploration without danger.
This setting encourages learning without panic.
Removing supports too early increases risk.
Patients must rebuild identity as movers and independent individuals.
This process takes time and emotional support.
Clinicians should expect emotional shifts.
Bilateral patients often compare themselves to unilateral users.
These comparisons can discourage progress.
Reframing success as personal helps.
Motivation may fluctuate during months of training.
Small milestones and recognition support persistence.
Encouragement must be realistic.
Regular use, even for short durations, predicts better long-term outcomes.
Inconsistent use often signals unresolved discomfort or fear.
Monitoring patterns helps early intervention.
Bilateral users place higher stress on hips, back, and shoulders.
Proper alignment and posture protect long-term health.
Regular assessment prevents secondary injury.
Success is defined by safe movement at home and in the community.
Uneven ground and crowds pose challenges.
Gradual exposure improves confidence.
Optimism without evidence can set patients up for disappointment.
Clinicians should base goals on observed performance.
Honesty protects trust.
Rapid escalation increases fatigue and injury risk.
Gradual increase supports tissue tolerance.
Patience prevents setbacks.
Caregivers often experience physical and emotional stress.
Ignoring this strain affects patient outcomes.
Support systems must be assessed.
Clinicians must balance the desire to restore walking with realistic risk.
Overpromising harms patients emotionally.
Ethical care values safety.
Some patients value transfers and independence more than walking distance.
These goals are valid.
Respect improves satisfaction.
Bilateral amputation alone should not disqualify patients.
Individual assessment reveals potential.
Fair evaluation preserves dignity.
Clinicians help patients navigate possibility and limitation.
Guidance builds partnership.
This role supports adherence.
Physicians, therapists, prosthetists, and counselors must work together.
Unified goals prevent confusion.
Team care improves outcomes.
Health and capacity change over time.
Regular reassessment allows adaptation.
Care is ongoing.
Bilateral amputees often present with a wider range of medical vulnerabilities than unilateral patients, and some profiles carry a clearly higher risk even when motivation and intent are strong.
Advanced age, severe vascular disease, reduced cardiac reserve, chronic lung disease, or a long history of wound complications can significantly limit safe rehabilitation potential.
Early identification of these profiles allows clinicians to shift focus from ideal outcomes to achievable ones, preventing unsafe expectations while still preserving dignity and purpose.
In bilateral cases, risk factors rarely exist in isolation, and their combined effect can be greater than the sum of individual issues.
For example, moderate heart disease combined with balance deficits and visual impairment may create a higher fall risk than any single condition alone.
Understanding this interaction helps clinicians anticipate challenges before they appear during training.
Recognizing risk does not mean denying prosthetic rehabilitation, but rather shaping it responsibly.
Risk stratification allows clinicians to decide on pacing, support level, device complexity, and outcome goals that protect patient safety.
When risk is acknowledged early, rehabilitation plans become more sustainable and humane.
Not all limiting factors are fixed, as weakness, poor endurance, balance deficits, and even emotional distress often improve with targeted rehabilitation and time.
Patients who initially appear unsuitable may show meaningful gains after structured conditioning or medical optimization.
Clinicians should view early assessments as dynamic rather than final judgments.
Some limitations, such as severe cardiopulmonary disease, progressive neurological conditions, or irreversible joint damage, may cap achievable outcomes despite best efforts.
Identifying these absolute limits helps clinicians avoid unsafe escalation or false reassurance.
Clear recognition protects both patient and care team from prolonged frustration.
Distinguishing between fixed and modifiable risks requires repeated observation rather than a single evaluation.
Short trials of conditioning or balance training often clarify whether improvement is possible.
This approach allows decisions to evolve based on evidence rather than assumption.
Response to pre-prosthetic and early prosthetic training often reveals more about long-term potential than static assessments alone.
Patients who adapt to instructions, improve balance awareness, and tolerate incremental challenges tend to progress further over time.
Early functional response is often the most honest indicator of readiness.
Slow early progress does not always predict failure, especially in older or medically complex patients.
What matters more is consistency, safety awareness, and gradual improvement rather than speed.
Clinicians should look for learning patterns rather than immediate performance.
Judging potential too early may exclude patients who simply need more time or different strategies.
Conversely, ignoring early warning signs of unsafe adaptation may expose patients to injury.
Balanced interpretation of early performance protects long-term outcomes.
Bilateral rehabilitation requires a clearly staged approach that respects the absence of a natural support limb and the higher cognitive and physical demands involved.
Progression should move deliberately from sitting balance and weight shifting to supported standing and finally to controlled stepping.
Skipping phases often leads to fear, falls, and loss of confidence.
Structure reduces uncertainty and anxiety by giving patients clear expectations and achievable milestones.
Knowing what comes next helps patients remain engaged during long rehabilitation timelines.
Predictable progression builds trust in the process.
While progression must be cautious, excessive delay can reduce motivation and conditioning.
Clinicians must strike a balance between protection and forward movement.
Small, regular gains sustain engagement.
For many bilateral amputees, the ability to transfer safely between bed, chair, toilet, and wheelchair defines independence more than walking distance.
These skills reduce reliance on caregivers and restore a sense of control early in rehabilitation.
Clinicians should prioritize transfers as primary goals.
Learning how to move safely on the floor and return to standing after a fall is essential for long-term safety.
Fear of being unable to get up often limits confidence more than fear of walking itself.
Teaching these skills early improves psychological security.
When patients master transfers and basic mobility, caregiver physical and emotional burden decreases significantly.
This reduction improves the overall rehabilitation environment.
Caregiver well-being directly influences patient success.
Walking with two prosthetic limbs requires substantially higher energy expenditure than unilateral walking, especially in older or medically compromised patients.
Fatigue often limits use before mechanical issues appear.
Energy management is therefore a medical necessity, not a comfort measure.
Patients must learn to plan activity with rest periods rather than pushing until exhaustion.
This approach preserves endurance and reduces injury risk.
Clinicians should normalize rest as a strategy, not a failure.
Patients who learn efficient movement patterns and pacing sustain prosthetic use longer.
Energy awareness protects cardiovascular health.
This skill supports lifelong mobility.
Without a biological limb to rely on, bilateral amputees must consciously learn balance strategies using vision, trunk control, and controlled movement.
Balance is no longer automatic and requires attention.
Training should emphasize awareness and control rather than speed or distance.
Fear of falling is common and can severely limit participation if not addressed directly.
Gradual exposure within safe environments allows confidence to grow without overwhelming the patient.
Confidence develops through repeated success, not reassurance alone.
Parallel bars and other support systems provide a controlled space where patients can explore movement safely.
This environment reduces panic and allows focus on technique.
Removing support too early often leads to setbacks.
Bilateral amputation often disrupts how patients see themselves as independent adults, workers, or caregivers.
Rebuilding this identity takes time and emotional support alongside physical training.
Clinicians should expect shifts in mood and self-perception.
Bilateral patients frequently compare themselves to unilateral users, which can create unrealistic expectations or discouragement.
Helping patients focus on personal progress rather than comparison supports emotional stability.
Reframing success as individual reduces frustration.
Motivation naturally fluctuates during extended rehabilitation.
Recognizing effort, celebrating small gains, and setting short-term goals help maintain engagement.
Encouragement must remain realistic to preserve trust.
Regular prosthetic use, even in short sessions, predicts better long-term adaptation and skill retention.
Inconsistent use often signals unresolved discomfort, fear, or poor alignment.
Monitoring use patterns allows early intervention.
Bilateral prosthetic users place increased load on hips, spine, shoulders, and upper limbs.
Poor alignment or posture can lead to chronic pain and secondary disability.
Regular biomechanical review is essential.
True success is measured by safe and confident movement at home and in the community.
Uneven terrain, crowds, and daily unpredictability present challenges that clinic training alone cannot replicate.
Gradual exposure builds competence and confidence.
Optimism unsupported by functional evidence can lead to disappointment and loss of trust.
Clinicians should ground goals in observed ability rather than ideal outcomes.
Honest communication protects morale.
Rapid escalation in wear time increases fatigue, pain, and injury risk.
Gradual progression allows tissues and confidence to adapt.
Patience prevents long-term setbacks.
Caregivers often carry significant physical and emotional responsibility during bilateral rehabilitation.
Unchecked strain can affect patient progress and home safety.
Support systems must be assessed regularly.
Clinicians must balance the desire to restore walking with realistic appraisal of medical and functional risk.
Overpromising can cause emotional harm and unsafe behavior.
Ethical care prioritizes safety alongside hope.
Some patients value independence in transfers and self-care more than walking distance or appearance.
These priorities are valid and should guide rehabilitation goals.
Respect improves satisfaction and adherence.
Bilateral amputation alone should never automatically disqualify a patient from prosthetic consideration.
Individual assessment often reveals unexpected potential.
Fair evaluation preserves dignity.
Clinicians are not merely deciding access to prosthetics, but guiding patients through realistic possibilities and limitations.
This partnership approach builds trust and long-term engagement.
Guidance supports adherence.
Successful bilateral rehabilitation requires coordination between physicians, therapists, prosthetists, and mental health professionals.
Unified goals prevent mixed messages and confusion.
Team care strengthens outcomes.
Health, strength, and priorities change over time, especially in chronic disease.
Regular reassessment allows adaptation of prosthetic goals and strategies.
Bilateral prosthetic care is a long-term journey, not a single decision.
At Robobionics, we have learned that bilateral prosthetic rehabilitation is never a single decision or a short phase of care, but a long-term partnership between clinicians, patients, families, and the prosthetic team.
Outcomes are shaped not only by devices, but by timing, selection, expectation setting, and continuous guidance as the patient’s body and confidence change.
When clinicians approach bilateral cases with patience and structure, results become more predictable and humane.
Careful selection is not meant to deny opportunity, but to protect patients from unsafe paths and emotional harm caused by unrealistic goals.
Clear criteria help clinicians decide when to proceed, when to slow down, and when to redefine success.
This clarity builds trust and prevents avoidable failure.
Success for bilateral amputees often looks different from textbook walking outcomes and must be measured through independence, safety, and quality of life.
Transfers, short-distance walking, self-care, and confidence in daily routines matter deeply to patients.
Clinicians who redefine success help patients stay engaged and satisfied.
Bilateral rehabilitation rewards gradual, well-paced progression far more than aggressive timelines.
Early patience preserves energy, prevents injury, and supports long-term use.
Timing remains one of the most powerful clinical tools available.
As an Indian prosthetics manufacturer, Robobionics works closely with clinicians managing complex bilateral cases across varied medical and social settings.
Our focus is on affordable, lightweight, and serviceable prosthetic solutions that support staged rehabilitation and real-world use.
By aligning thoughtful selection with adaptable prosthetic design, we aim to help clinicians restore mobility, dignity, and realistic independence for bilateral amputees across India.
Many prosthetic delays do not happen because of surgical problems or device limitations. They happen
Traumatic amputations place doctors under intense pressure to save life first, but the decisions made
Amputation after cancer is not just a surgical event. It is the end of one
When a child loses a limb, the challenge is never only physical. A child’s body
Last updated: November 10, 2022
Thank you for shopping at Robo Bionics.
If, for any reason, You are not completely satisfied with a purchase We invite You to review our policy on refunds and returns.
The following terms are applicable for any products that You purchased with Us.
The words of which the initial letter is capitalized have meanings defined under the following conditions. The following definitions shall have the same meaning regardless of whether they appear in singular or in plural.
For the purposes of this Return and Refund Policy:
Company (referred to as either “the Company”, “Robo Bionics”, “We”, “Us” or “Our” in this Agreement) refers to Bionic Hope Private Limited, Pearl Haven, 1st Floor Kumbharwada, Manickpur Near St. Michael’s Church Vasai Road West, Palghar Maharashtra 401202.
Goods refer to the items offered for sale on the Website.
Orders mean a request by You to purchase Goods from Us.
Service refers to the Services Provided like Online Demo and Live Demo.
Website refers to Robo Bionics, accessible from https://robobionics.in
You means the individual accessing or using the Service, or the company, or other legal entity on behalf of which such individual is accessing or using the Service, as applicable.
You are entitled to cancel Your Service Bookings within 7 days without giving any reason for doing so, before completion of Delivery.
The deadline for cancelling a Service Booking is 7 days from the date on which You received the Confirmation of Service.
In order to exercise Your right of cancellation, You must inform Us of your decision by means of a clear statement. You can inform us of your decision by:
We will reimburse You no later than 7 days from the day on which We receive your request for cancellation, if above criteria is met. We will use the same means of payment as You used for the Service Booking, and You will not incur any fees for such reimbursement.
Please note in case you miss a Service Booking or Re-schedule the same we shall only entertain the request once.
In order for the Goods to be eligible for a return, please make sure that:
The following Goods cannot be returned:
We reserve the right to refuse returns of any merchandise that does not meet the above return conditions in our sole discretion.
Only regular priced Goods may be refunded by 50%. Unfortunately, Goods on sale cannot be refunded. This exclusion may not apply to You if it is not permitted by applicable law.
You are responsible for the cost and risk of returning the Goods to Us. You should send the Goods at the following:
We cannot be held responsible for Goods damaged or lost in return shipment. Therefore, We recommend an insured and trackable courier service. We are unable to issue a refund without actual receipt of the Goods or proof of received return delivery.
If you have any questions about our Returns and Refunds Policy, please contact us:
Last Updated on: 1st Jan 2021
These Terms and Conditions (“Terms”) govern Your access to and use of the website, platforms, applications, products and services (ively, the “Services”) offered by Robo Bionics® (a registered trademark of Bionic Hope Private Limited, also used as a trade name), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, having its Corporate office at Pearl Heaven Bungalow, 1st Floor, Manickpur, Kumbharwada, Vasai Road (West), Palghar – 401202, Maharashtra, India (“Company”, “We”, “Us” or “Our”). By accessing or using the Services, You (each a “User”) agree to be bound by these Terms and all applicable laws and regulations. If You do not agree with any part of these Terms, You must immediately discontinue use of the Services.
1.1 “Individual Consumer” means a natural person aged eighteen (18) years or above who registers to use Our products or Services following evaluation and prescription by a Rehabilitation Council of India (“RCI”)–registered Prosthetist.
1.2 “Entity Consumer” means a corporate organisation, nonprofit entity, CSR sponsor or other registered organisation that sponsors one or more Individual Consumers to use Our products or Services.
1.3 “Clinic” means an RCI-registered Prosthetics and Orthotics centre or Prosthetist that purchases products and Services from Us for fitment to Individual Consumers.
1.4 “Platform” means RehabConnect™, Our online marketplace by which Individual or Entity Consumers connect with Clinics in their chosen locations.
1.5 “Products” means Grippy® Bionic Hand, Grippy® Mech, BrawnBand™, WeightBand™, consumables, accessories and related hardware.
1.6 “Apps” means Our clinician-facing and end-user software applications supporting Product use and data collection.
1.7 “Impact Dashboard™” means the analytics interface provided to CSR, NGO, corporate and hospital sponsors.
1.8 “Services” includes all Products, Apps, the Platform and the Impact Dashboard.
2.1 Individual Consumers must be at least eighteen (18) years old and undergo evaluation and prescription by an RCI-registered Prosthetist prior to purchase or use of any Products or Services.
2.2 Entity Consumers must be duly registered under the laws of India and may sponsor one or more Individual Consumers.
2.3 Clinics must maintain valid RCI registration and comply with all applicable clinical and professional standards.
3.1 Robo Bionics acts solely as an intermediary connecting Users with Clinics via the Platform. We do not endorse or guarantee the quality, legality or outcomes of services rendered by any Clinic. Each Clinic is solely responsible for its professional services and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
4.1 All content, trademarks, logos, designs and software on Our website, Apps and Platform are the exclusive property of Bionic Hope Private Limited or its licensors.
4.2 Subject to these Terms, We grant You a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to use the Services for personal, non-commercial purposes.
4.3 You may not reproduce, modify, distribute, decompile, reverse engineer or create derivative works of any portion of the Services without Our prior written consent.
5.1 Limited Warranty. We warrant that Products will be free from workmanship defects under normal use as follows:
(a) Grippy™ Bionic Hand, BrawnBand® and WeightBand®: one (1) year from date of purchase, covering manufacturing defects only.
(b) Chargers and batteries: six (6) months from date of purchase.
(c) Grippy Mech™: three (3) months from date of purchase.
(d) Consumables (e.g., gloves, carry bags): no warranty.
5.2 Custom Sockets. Sockets fabricated by Clinics are covered only by the Clinic’s optional warranty and subject to physiological changes (e.g., stump volume, muscle sensitivity).
5.3 Exclusions. Warranty does not apply to damage caused by misuse, user negligence, unauthorised repairs, Acts of God, or failure to follow the Instruction Manual.
5.4 Claims. To claim warranty, You must register the Product online, provide proof of purchase, and follow the procedures set out in the Warranty Card.
5.5 Disclaimer. To the maximum extent permitted by law, all other warranties, express or implied, including merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, are disclaimed.
6.1 We collect personal contact details, physiological evaluation data, body measurements, sensor calibration values, device usage statistics and warranty information (“User Data”).
6.2 User Data is stored on secure servers of our third-party service providers and transmitted via encrypted APIs.
6.3 By using the Services, You consent to collection, storage, processing and transfer of User Data within Our internal ecosystem and to third-party service providers for analytics, R&D and support.
6.4 We implement reasonable security measures and comply with the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011.
6.5 A separate Privacy Policy sets out detailed information on data processing, user rights, grievance redressal and cross-border transfers, which forms part of these Terms.
7.1 Pursuant to the Information Technology Rules, 2021, We have given the Charge of Grievance Officer to our QC Head:
- Address: Grievance Officer
- Email: support@robobionics.in
- Phone: +91-8668372127
7.2 All support tickets and grievances must be submitted exclusively via the Robo Bionics Customer Support portal at https://robobionics.freshdesk.com/.
7.3 We will acknowledge receipt of your ticket within twenty-four (24) working hours and endeavour to resolve or provide a substantive response within seventy-two (72) working hours, excluding weekends and public holidays.
8.1 Pricing. Product and Service pricing is as per quotations or purchase orders agreed in writing.
8.2 Payment. We offer (a) 100% advance payment with possible incentives or (b) stage-wise payment plans without incentives.
8.3 Refunds. No refunds, except pro-rata adjustment where an Individual Consumer is medically unfit to proceed or elects to withdraw mid-stage, in which case unused stage fees apply.
9.1 Users must follow instructions provided by RCI-registered professionals and the User Manual.
9.2 Users and Entity Consumers shall indemnify and hold Us harmless from all liabilities, claims, damages and expenses arising from misuse of the Products, failure to follow professional guidance, or violation of these Terms.
10.1 To the extent permitted by law, Our total liability for any claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms or the Services shall not exceed the aggregate amount paid by You to Us in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim.
10.2 We shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damages, including loss of profit, data or goodwill.
11.1 Our Products are classified as “Rehabilitation Aids,” not medical devices for diagnostic purposes.
11.2 Manufactured under ISO 13485:2016 quality management and tested for electrical safety under IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2.
11.3 Products shall only be used under prescription and supervision of RCI-registered Prosthetists, Physiotherapists or Occupational Therapists.
We do not host third-party content or hardware. Any third-party services integrated with Our Apps are subject to their own terms and privacy policies.
13.1 All intellectual property rights in the Services and User Data remain with Us or our licensors.
13.2 Users grant Us a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free licence to use anonymised usage data for analytics, product improvement and marketing.
14.1 We may amend these Terms at any time. Material changes shall be notified to registered Users at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date, via email and website notice.
14.2 Continued use of the Services after the effective date constitutes acceptance of the revised Terms.
Neither party shall be liable for delay or failure to perform any obligation under these Terms due to causes beyond its reasonable control, including Acts of God, pandemics, strikes, war, terrorism or government regulations.
16.1 All disputes shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16.2 A sole arbitrator shall be appointed by Bionic Hope Private Limited or, failing agreement within thirty (30) days, by the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration.
16.3 Seat of arbitration: Mumbai, India.
16.4 Governing law: Laws of India.
16.5 Courts at Mumbai have exclusive jurisdiction over any proceedings to enforce an arbitral award.
17.1 Severability. If any provision is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder shall remain in full force.
17.2 Waiver. No waiver of any breach shall constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision.
17.3 Assignment. You may not assign your rights or obligations without Our prior written consent.
By accessing or using the Products and/or Services of Bionic Hope Private Limited, You acknowledge that You have read, understood and agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions.